<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Climatologist Questions &#8220;Sloppy Science&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://climatepatrol.net/2008/03/16/climatologist-questions-sloppy-science/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://climatepatrol.net/2008/03/16/climatologist-questions-sloppy-science/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 21:38:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Climate Patrol</title>
		<link>http://climatepatrol.net/2008/03/16/climatologist-questions-sloppy-science/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>Climate Patrol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 22:36:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climatepatrol.net/?p=39#comment-48</guid>
		<description>Sod, thank you for your comment. I think Spencer just asks questions. Those who claim to know the linear AGW trend might know the answer. The point Spencer makes though is the hypothesis that the capacity of greenhouse gases to trap heat is overestimated, considering the heat storage capacity of the oceans [Roger Pielcke, Sr.] and the change in cloud formation [Spencer's specialty].</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sod, thank you for your comment. I think Spencer just asks questions. Those who claim to know the linear AGW trend might know the answer. The point Spencer makes though is the hypothesis that the capacity of greenhouse gases to trap heat is overestimated, considering the heat storage capacity of the oceans [Roger Pielcke, Sr.] and the change in cloud formation [Spencer's specialty].</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sod</title>
		<link>http://climatepatrol.net/2008/03/16/climatologist-questions-sloppy-science/#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>sod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 21:42:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climatepatrol.net/?p=39#comment-47</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Well, &lt;b&gt;how do you know&lt;/b&gt; this wasn’t the result of a small, natural change in cloud cover? Doesn’t it seem like (another) coincidence that the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO) &lt;b&gt;just happened&lt;/b&gt; to shift to a different mode in 1977, about the time that the warming started? …&lt;/i&gt;

yawn. will you wake me up, when Spencer publishes a peer reviewed paper, that proposes a clear alternative theory?

the letter does NOT contain a single supported argument.

"maybe it is something else" is NOT a counter argument to anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Well, <b>how do you know</b> this wasn’t the result of a small, natural change in cloud cover? Doesn’t it seem like (another) coincidence that the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO) <b>just happened</b> to shift to a different mode in 1977, about the time that the warming started? …</i></p>
<p>yawn. will you wake me up, when Spencer publishes a peer reviewed paper, that proposes a clear alternative theory?</p>
<p>the letter does NOT contain a single supported argument.</p>
<p>&#8220;maybe it is something else&#8221; is NOT a counter argument to anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
