<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Climate Science and Politics &#187; 176</title>
	<atom:link href="http://climatepatrol.net/tag/176/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://climatepatrol.net</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 09:43:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Loehle Reconstruction – A New Consensus for AGW Skeptics?</title>
		<link>http://climatepatrol.net/2008/01/26/loehle-reconstruction-a-new-consensus-for-agw-skeptics/</link>
		<comments>http://climatepatrol.net/2008/01/26/loehle-reconstruction-a-new-consensus-for-agw-skeptics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 16:30:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AGW Consensus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[English Climate Categories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[116]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[136]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[137]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[138]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[141]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[145]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[170]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[176]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[55]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[60]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climatepatrol.net/?p=32</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ The above graph shows that the 29-year average temperature lies now about 0.5 C above the period before the proxy records stop in 1935. For the Loehle reconstruction graph, please click at: http://www.oekologismus.de/?p=883. The supplementary information was published as “Correction to: A 2000-Year Global Temperature Reconstruction Based on Non-Tree Ring Proxies” by Craig Loehle, J. Huston McCulloch, in the Journal &#8216;Energy and Environment&#8217; (2008), vol. 19 No. 1, pp. 93-100, &#8216;a correction to Loehle Energy and Environment (2007)&#8217;.  The paper was also published under the title &#8216;a 2000-year global temperature reconstruction based on non-treering proxies&#8217; at the National Council for Air and Stream Inprovement, Inc. (ncasi) Now it seems to me a good approach to use the same smoothing of a 29 year running mean as Loehle used for his graph and apply it on the accurate temperature history since 1880. In the above chart, I used the data which can be downloaded at the NOAA Satelite and Information Service here: http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/research/2007/ann/global.html#gtemp . Professor Stefan Rahmstorf, German oceanographer and climatologist at the Potsdam University, recently claimed on TV that a dozen recent research papers agree without exception that it is now &#8220;deutlich wärmer&#8221; (significantly warmer) than anytime during the last millenium. We often hear about a debate [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://climatepatrol.net/2008/01/26/loehle-reconstruction-a-new-consensus-for-agw-skeptics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
