<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Climate Science and Politics &#187; Christopher Monckton</title>
	<atom:link href="http://climatepatrol.net/tag/christopher-monckton/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://climatepatrol.net</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 09:43:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Monckton Interviews Greenpeace Activist</title>
		<link>http://climatepatrol.net/2010/01/03/monckton-interviews-greenpeace-activist/</link>
		<comments>http://climatepatrol.net/2010/01/03/monckton-interviews-greenpeace-activist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 13:06:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate Propaganda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[English Climate Categories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christopher Monckton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change controversy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change facts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global cooling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greenpeace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Monckton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climatepatrol.net/?p=152</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Monckton suggests eveybody to check his claims by means of scientific data easily available in the internet. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://climatepatrol.net/2010/01/03/monckton-interviews-greenpeace-activist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Monckton and Climate Sensitivity: Teacher or Student?</title>
		<link>http://climatepatrol.net/2008/08/21/monckton-and-climate-sensitivity-teacher-or-student/</link>
		<comments>http://climatepatrol.net/2008/08/21/monckton-and-climate-sensitivity-teacher-or-student/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 21:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Climate Patrol</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AGW Consensus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[English Climate Categories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Temperature History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[APS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arthur Smith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christopher Monckton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate sensitivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Monckton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climatepatrol.net/?p=66</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some say that he has become a real climatologist, others &#8211; mainly AGW alarmists &#8211; say that he is not a scientist but a strawman with bad manners. The public critiques of climate skeptic Christopher Monckton, 3rd Viscount of Benchley, may not always demonstrate the traits of a Gentleman - or even Lord. Well, if you are simply looking for the entertainment value of a debate, I suggest you go directly to the Science and Public Policy Website with it&#8217;s response to Dr. Arthur Smith&#8217;s critique of Christopher Monckton&#8217;s &#8216;Climate Sensitivity Reconsidered&#8217;. For all the others, I like to show how this whole debate regarding the magnitude of that anthropogenic global warming (AGW), as widely attributed to the burning of fossil fuels, fits in with Climatepatrol&#8217;s layman&#8217;s attempt to start to falsify parts of the IPCC view on climate sensitivity in a recent post. For the purpose of a follow-up on said climate review, I am thankful for Monckton&#8217;s newly launched debate on climate sensitivity. I am also thankful for the information given in the critique by Dr. Arthur Smith against Monckton&#8217;s paper, after the first publication of which the APS chief editor hastened to emphazise that &#8221;the following article has not undergone any scientific [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://climatepatrol.net/2008/08/21/monckton-and-climate-sensitivity-teacher-or-student/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
